Our Services

Get 15% Discount on your First Order

Volkswagen was founded in 1937 in Nazi Germany as a “pet project”…

Volkswagen was founded in 1937 in Nazi Germany as a “pet project” of dictator Adolf Hitler, who desired to develop what he termed the “people’s car” (Volkswagen translates into “the people’s car” in English). Headquartered in Wolfsburg, Germany, the automaker’s continued existence was precarious after Germany lost the war. However, a British major opted to keep Volkswagen open, and the firm continued to grow. Sales of Volkswagen were slower in the United States than in other areas because of its questionable founding, but the introduction of the Volkswagen Beetle caused U.S. sales to skyrocket. Soon the Beetle had become the best-selling car import in the United States. When sales began to decline in the 1970s, VW began introducing new generations of cars. It also started making a series of acquisitions, most notably acquiring the Bentley and Lamborghini brands in 1998 and the Porsche brand in 2012. In the decades since its founding, Volkswagen became a formidable competitor to global car makers such as Toyota, Ford, and General Motors. Its cars have been widely suc- cessful, winning a number of global awards. In 1999 the Volkswagen Beetle was selected the fourth runner-up as the Car of the Century, after the Model T, the Mini, and the Citroen DS. In 2015 VW was elected to 43rd place among Fortune magazine’s World’s Most admired Companies. Earlier that year, the VW Golf had been named the North American Car of the Year. Until recently, VW was highly valued for its sustainability goals. It became the first car manufacturer to adopt ISO 14001 principles, international environmental principles that act as standards for global firms. It adopted a number of sustainability goals in 2002 at a time before sustainability became a hot topic. VW began investing in vehicles that would reduce carbon emissions early, including electric and diesel vehicles. In 2014 VW introduced the VW XL1, which it claimed to be the most fuel-efficient car in the world at the time. Its reputation for sustainability was so great that it won an international sustainability award. VW’s reputation for sustainability worsened the blow to its reputation when it all came crashing down years later


VW’s downfall stemmed from the same thing that enabled it to commit such wide-scale misconduct in the first place: technology. Although the impact of technology has created benefits for businesses and consumers alike, it has also provided a greater opportunity to cheat ethical and legal requirements. Volkswagen, once lauded for its green reputation, saw its reputation crumble after it was discovered the company had purposefully fooled regulators and consumers with its emissions claims. Volkswagen used a “defeat device” in its software that changed the vehicle’s performance depending upon the environment. For instance, the software was able to detect when vehicles were undergoing emissions test- ing. During this testing, the software made the vehicles run below performance, which released fewer emissions and met requirements. However, on the road the cars ran at maximum performance and gave off up to 40 times the allowable limit for emissions in the United States. Volkswagen estimates that 11 million vehicles in the United States and Europe were affected by this defeat device. Until the scandal broke, VW had promoted itself as an eco- friendly company. Its commercials featured Volkswagen rally driver and host on Top Gear USA Tanner Foust driving elderly women around town in a TDI Volkswagen to dispel the myth that diesel is slow. As a result of its marketing, Volkswagen made large in-roads in gaining acceptance for its clean diesel vehicles, even though many car buyers had a negative view of diesel previously. This green image was highly beneficial for Volkswagen as consumer values are changing to value greener products.

While technology allowed VW to cheat the system, it also played a large part in its downfall. Discovery began when European testers noticed that VW vehicles did not perform as well on emissions testing on the road as they did in the lab. They commissioned a team in West Virginia to conduct research on VW vehicles made for Americans because the United States has some of the toughest emissions standards in the world. The team in West Virginia used a portable emission system measurement to measure emissions on the road. They found that the measurements did not nearly match up with what was shown in lab tests. The results were reported to the Environmental Protection Agency, which confronted Volkswagen with the evidence. Volkswagen eventually admit- ted it had designed and installed a defeat device that could detect when the vehicle was being tested and modify its performance levels so that it would meet emissions requirements. A whistle-blower later filed a lawsuit against VW claiming that it began destroy- ing documents that could implicate the firm and fired him when he refused to get rid of documents. Volkswagen denies that the employee’s departure had anything to do with the emissions scandal. 


As a result of the scandal, Volkswagen’s CEO resigned and governments are demanding answers. Such a fraud does not only violate ethical standards but also laws and regula- tion in Europe and the United States. The company agreed to pay up to $17.5 billion to compensate consumers affected by its defeat devices, which included retrofitting and buy- ing back impacted vehicles. Those who knew about or were responsible for the defeat device’s installation could face jail time. Six executives and employees have been indicted for knowing about the conspiracy. One of the executives arrested was VW’s emissions compliance manager. Germany has also launched a probe into whether former CEO Mar- tin Winterkorn had knowledge about the misconduct beforehand. Winterkorn claims he did not become aware of the misconduct until the scandal erupted. Perhaps the worst impact the scandal has caused is to VW’s reputation. Many VW customers claim they purchased the cars because they believed them to be better for the environment and felt utterly betrayed by the company. Consumer rights were violated because consumers did not have accurate information, meaning they were not able to make informed purchasing decisions. Its reputation for sustainability has been shattered, and two awards it had been given for “Green Car of the Year” were pulled. VW is not the only company implicated in the conspiracy. U.S. lawyers accuse German parts supplier Robert Bosch GmbH of designing the defeat devices and knowing that they were being installed in VW vehicles to cheat emissions standards. A 2008 email was used as evidence in which Robert Bosch allegedly demanded that VW indemnify the firm for any future legal repercussions, suggesting that the company knew full well that it was violating laws. Robert Bosch did not admit to wrongdoing but agreed to pay $327.5 million to settle the civil claims.

VW agreed to plead guilty and pay a criminal fine of $2.8 billion in the United States, as well as an additional $1.5 billion for breaking civil, environmental, customs, and financial regulations. The penalty could have been as high as $34 billion under U.S. laws but was reduced because of VW’s cooperation with the investigation. In total, criminal and civil fines and settlements are estimated to cost VW $22 billion in the United States.


VW hopes its settlement with U.S. regulators will be the first step toward putting the scan- dal behind it. As part of its plea, VW agreed to a three-year probation, a ban on selling diesel vehicles in the United States, and an independent compliance monitor who will oversee VW’s operations over the next three years. However, truly restoring its reputation will require VW to incorporate ethics and appropriate practices into the organization from the inside-out, something that was severely lacking in the firm’s corporate culture prior to the scandal. Because it is one of the world’s largest carmakers operating in an oligopoly, other global car companies may benefit from the scandal and gain market share from Volkswagen. At the same time, while they might benefit from a competitive standpoint, VW’s conduct has caused problems for the industry as a whole. Consumers are now questioning the environ- mental claims of other car brands, and automakers will have to work harder to prove that their claims are accurate. Consumer trust is easily lost and is not restored overnight.


1. Explain how the culture of Volkswagen created this ethical scandal. 


2. While Volkswagen claimed to support ethics and sustainability, how can they recover

from this ethical disaster? 


3. Do you believe this scandal will lead to tougher scrutiny of companies’ environmental

claims in the future? Why or why not?

Share This Post


Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

Law 525: Fundamentals of Intellectual Property Law   1….

Law 525: Fundamentals of Intellectual Property Law   1. ________________, ________________, ________________, and ________________ are the four main types of intellectual property.   2. Which is true of common law trademark rights?   A. The rights are created under state law, created through use of the trademark, limited to the

Chapter 1 Quiz Seeing the Strange in the Familiar means to:…

Chapter 1 Quiz Seeing the Strange in the Familiar means to: Question 1 options: Ask why about our assumptions Assume most individuals are not aware of their surroundings Seeing how categories in which we fall influence our life experiences Consider how people act strangely Question 2 (10 points) Sociology is:

Classic Case 16.1 Read Webster v. Blue Ship Tea Room , 198 N.E.2…

Classic Case 16.1 Read Webster v. Blue Ship Tea Room, 198 N.E.2d  309 (1964).    Webster is a well-known example of a court protecting local customs and traditions.  When a patron in a Boston restaurant chokes on a fish bone in a bowl of chowder, the court concludes there was no liability

Read Webster v. Blue Ship Tea Room , 198 N.E.2 d  309 (1964).  …

Read Webster v. Blue Ship Tea Room, 198 N.E.2d  309 (1964).    Webster is a well-known example of a court protecting local customs and traditions.  When a patron in a Boston restaurant chokes on a fish bone that is in a bowl of chowder, the court concludes there was no liability

The Sarbanes Oxley Act-specifically as it applies to Boards of…

The Sarbanes Oxley Act-specifically as it applies to Boards of Directors of companies. You can research the liability of boards under the act, and how it has changed director liability since it went into effect and how boards have changed since the act went into effect. Cite and use case

What is Marketable Title and Title Insurance? This week’s threaded…

What is Marketable Title and Title Insurance? This week’s threaded discussion is designed to have the class consider and understand title insurance (covered in chapter 13).   Each class member should: Post 1:   Please discuss/explain what title insurance is and what it means to have “marketable title”.    TITLE ASSURANCE AND TITLE

The Sonny Bono Copyright Term Extension Act of 1998 was widely…

The Sonny Bono Copyright Term Extension Act of 1998 was widely viewed as A) a fair extension of the term of copyright. b) motivated by a desire to protect Mickey Mouse from falling into the public domain. c) the crowning achievement of Congressman Bono. d) None of the above.

Donald is an Orlando City produce broker for Super Walmart….

Donald is an Orlando City produce broker for Super Walmart. Jennifer Lopez is a 18-year-old college student who works for Super Walmart from 4am to 7am each weekday before she attends classes at UCF. Donald has instructed Jennifer on the proper packing of produce as follows: “Look, put the bad

What  does  the  Federal  Reserve  do?    This  is  the…

What  does  the  Federal  Reserve  do?    This  is  the  question  you  will  answer  in  this  assignment.    We  have   talked  briefly  about  the  creation  of  the  Federal  Reserve  and  how  its  monetary  policy  can  be  used  to   influence  the  economy,  but  that  it  only  one  part  of

The U.S. Supreme Court issued its decision in  Dobbs v. Jackson…

The U.S. Supreme Court issued its decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, holding that there is no right to abortion in the U.S. Constitution and returning the authority to regulate abortion to the individual states. The Dobbs decision poses a unique set of challenges for employers, as state regulations on abortion