Kierkegaard’s claim that subjective (think: personal) truth is more important then objective truth is quite bold. While he is probably right to note that subjective truths are usually more meaningful to us than objective truths, is he right to give subjective truths the most important seat at the table, so to speak? Can you think of anything potentially dangerous about making subjective truths the most important truths? (Think about the story of Abraham and Isaac!) Are the potential dangers of prioritizing subjective truths worth the risk? Let me know what you think!
What does it mean to read the Bible theologically? Using the information from pages 2567-2568, (ATTACHED) summarize the key points. What do you hope to gain in
What does it mean to read the Bible theologically? Using the information from pages 2567-2568, (ATTACHED) summarize the key points. What do you hope to gain in the process of reading the Bible theolog