In the case of Welge v. Planters Lifesavers , Richard Welge…

In the case of Welge v. Planters Lifesavers, Richard Welge received permanent damage to his hand when he closed the plastic lid on a glass jar of Planters peanuts and the glass shattered and cut his hand. The peanuts were purchased at K-Mart and went from the store to the top of Welge’s refrigerator where they were untouched except the two times Welge got peanuts from the jar. The first instance the lid went back fine and the second time Welge was injured. Welge brought charges against Planters, K-Mart and Brockway who manufactured the jar. Justice Posner used strict product liability to find the defendant liable for the damage caused to Welge’s hand. Strict product liability requires that the plaintiff proves that the item was defective when they purchased it, that the defect made the product unreasonably dangerous and that the product is what caused injury (Kubasek et al., 2019). Welge was able to prove that it was the product that injured his hand and since permanent damage was caused it can be concluded that it was unreasonably dangerous. Justice Godfrey used testimonies from Welge and the person he boarded with to determine that the jar did not become defective nor was it damaged from the time it was taken from the shelf at K-Mart until it was placed on the top of the refrigerator at Welge’s home. He further determined that the jar was stored as one normally would store such an item and there was no need to take extra preventative measures to protect the item from damage. Since the likelihood that the jar was damaged after the item was purchased was very low, Justice Posner deemed the defect existed prior to purchase and stated K-Mart was the tortfeasor. Product liability law applies to sellers even when there was no fault on their end for not identifying the defect (Kubasek et al., 2019). 

I agree with the decision that the product damaged Welge’s hand and that there clearly was some sort of defect that caused the jar to shatter like that. However, I was surprised to learn in this chapter that sellers can be held liable for the products that they sell and K-Mart was deemed the tortfeasor. It’s hard to believe that stores like Target and Walmart that carry tons of items can be held liable for damages that are caused to their customers by defective items. What I would have expected would be that Planters was held liable and they would go after Brockway for creating a faulty glass jar. 

I was curious to see if other product liability cases had been brought against Target and Walmart and found a case against Walmart regarding a defective bike pedal (Walmart hit with products liability suit over allegedly defective bike pedal, 2021) and a case against Target for injuries a child sustained using a potty-training seat (Murphy, 2022). While I was initially surprised that the seller of items can be held liable, perhaps it encourages sellers to procure reliable items of higher quality which in the end keeps everyone safer. I would also imagine that the sellers attempt to recoup damages from the manufacturers of the items. 

 

Answer the following question:

What are the judge’s reasons for reversing the decisions of the lower court?

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

Law 525: Fundamentals of Intellectual Property Law   1….

Law 525: Fundamentals of Intellectual Property Law   1. ________________, ________________, ________________, and ________________ are the four main types of intellectual property.   2. Which is true of common law trademark rights?   A. The rights are created under state law, created through use of the trademark, limited to the

Chapter 1 Quiz Seeing the Strange in the Familiar means to:…

Chapter 1 Quiz Seeing the Strange in the Familiar means to: Question 1 options: Ask why about our assumptions Assume most individuals are not aware of their surroundings Seeing how categories in which we fall influence our life experiences Consider how people act strangely Question 2 (10 points) Sociology is:

Classic Case 16.1 Read Webster v. Blue Ship Tea Room , 198 N.E.2…

Classic Case 16.1 Read Webster v. Blue Ship Tea Room, 198 N.E.2d  309 (1964).    Webster is a well-known example of a court protecting local customs and traditions.  When a patron in a Boston restaurant chokes on a fish bone in a bowl of chowder, the court concludes there was no liability

Read Webster v. Blue Ship Tea Room , 198 N.E.2 d  309 (1964).  …

Read Webster v. Blue Ship Tea Room, 198 N.E.2d  309 (1964).    Webster is a well-known example of a court protecting local customs and traditions.  When a patron in a Boston restaurant chokes on a fish bone that is in a bowl of chowder, the court concludes there was no liability

The Sarbanes Oxley Act-specifically as it applies to Boards of…

The Sarbanes Oxley Act-specifically as it applies to Boards of Directors of companies. You can research the liability of boards under the act, and how it has changed director liability since it went into effect and how boards have changed since the act went into effect. Cite and use case

What is Marketable Title and Title Insurance? This week’s threaded…

What is Marketable Title and Title Insurance? This week’s threaded discussion is designed to have the class consider and understand title insurance (covered in chapter 13).   Each class member should: Post 1:   Please discuss/explain what title insurance is and what it means to have “marketable title”.    TITLE ASSURANCE AND TITLE

The Sonny Bono Copyright Term Extension Act of 1998 was widely…

The Sonny Bono Copyright Term Extension Act of 1998 was widely viewed as A) a fair extension of the term of copyright. b) motivated by a desire to protect Mickey Mouse from falling into the public domain. c) the crowning achievement of Congressman Bono. d) None of the above.

Donald is an Orlando City produce broker for Super Walmart….

Donald is an Orlando City produce broker for Super Walmart. Jennifer Lopez is a 18-year-old college student who works for Super Walmart from 4am to 7am each weekday before she attends classes at UCF. Donald has instructed Jennifer on the proper packing of produce as follows: “Look, put the bad

What  does  the  Federal  Reserve  do?    This  is  the…

What  does  the  Federal  Reserve  do?    This  is  the  question  you  will  answer  in  this  assignment.    We  have   talked  briefly  about  the  creation  of  the  Federal  Reserve  and  how  its  monetary  policy  can  be  used  to   influence  the  economy,  but  that  it  only  one  part  of

The U.S. Supreme Court issued its decision in  Dobbs v. Jackson…

The U.S. Supreme Court issued its decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, holding that there is no right to abortion in the U.S. Constitution and returning the authority to regulate abortion to the individual states. The Dobbs decision poses a unique set of challenges for employers, as state regulations on abortion